With the onset of the new century, digitalisation spread rapidly and “the user” began to be courted just as “the consumer” had been before it. Every public and private body in the West hastened to form an online version of itself as communication between the individual and the wider world was construed as vital to both professional success and basic social functioning.
Society became like market research on a mass scale. Opinions were wanted and audience interaction was plugged at every turn by the media and public bodies, creating a huge, overflowing vat of homogenous talk. By the late ‘90s, the term “user-friendly” had outgrown its buzzword status, but having permeated society to its core, the concept endured as fundamental to our ideology.
In the last few years, places and spaces devoted to Comment have become ubiquitous, whilst distinctions between professional and amateur commentators have become blurred and in some ways irrelevant. Comment was invested in as the shiny new commodity – perhaps seen as a perfect, renewable resource because it’s free.
Culture, that useful, catch-all deposit for a plethora of odds and ends, has proved the ideal climate for the growth of Comment, as it supports the increasing tendency towards self-referencing and self-reflexivity that has resulted from the general acceleration of media and information-exchange. The national media has capitalised upon the rapid succession of social networking sites, boosting its prominence in cultural life and, with the near-mania for audience engagement, bringing us closer to it.
Irony
Something about the combination of this new prominence of the media and our culture’s appetite for myth-making proved to be toxic, and everything began to seem unpleasantly “seeped” – as they would say – in rhetoric. With hyperbole a key element of this, we are perpetually in a state of crisis: off-hand, I recall hearing that criticism, culture, schools, politics and British sport are all in a state of crisis, and this was just yesterday. Initially, I was devastated, but who knows? It might be different tomorrow.
Click to keep reading
Love and Irony in Twenty-first Century Culture
With the onset of the new century, digitalisation spread rapidly and “the user” began to be courted just as “the consumer” had been before it. Every public and private body in the West hastened to form an online version of itself as communication between the individual and the wider world was construed as vital to both professional success and basic social functioning.
Society became like market research on a mass scale. Opinions were wanted and audience interaction was plugged at every turn by the media and public bodies, creating a huge, overflowing vat of homogenous talk. By the late ‘90s, the term “user-friendly” had outgrown its buzzword status, but having permeated society to its core, the concept endured as fundamental to our ideology.
In the last few years, places and spaces devoted to Comment have become ubiquitous, whilst distinctions between professional and amateur commentators have become blurred and in some ways irrelevant. Comment was invested in as the shiny new commodity – perhaps seen as a perfect, renewable resource because it’s free.
Culture, that useful, catch-all deposit for a plethora of odds and ends, has proved the ideal climate for the growth of Comment, as it supports the increasing tendency towards self-referencing and self-reflexivity that has resulted from the general acceleration of media and information-exchange. The national media has capitalised upon the rapid succession of social networking sites, boosting its prominence in cultural life and, with the near-mania for audience engagement, bringing us closer to it.
Irony
Something about the combination of this new prominence of the media and our culture’s appetite for myth-making proved to be toxic, and everything began to seem unpleasantly “seeped” – as they would say – in rhetoric. With hyperbole a key element of this, we are perpetually in a state of crisis: off-hand, I recall hearing that criticism, culture, schools, politics and British sport are all in a state of crisis, and this was just yesterday. Initially, I was devastated, but who knows? It might be different tomorrow.
Click to keep reading
→ Leave a comment
Posted in DigiCulture, Tales From The Golden Age, The State of Culture
Tagged Comment, digitalisation, La Roux, pop, rhetoric, the media